Category Archives: economy

WEAR THE PATRIOT’S MASK

How should we deal with people who make our national crisis worse by refusing to adopt effective safety practices?  Over six million Americans have been diagnosed with the Covid -19.  More than 180,000 have died.  Millions more have lost jobs and the ability to support themselves.  The national debt that we must repay will soon be more than the total value of everything the nation produces in a year for the first time since the end of WWII.

Our most effective weapons in a war against the virus are:

  1. Wear a mask in public places
  2. Maintain social distance.
  3. Don’t congregate in large groups.

We lack leadership and enforcement of those practices, especially at the national level, where our President routinely denies the facts and refuses to personally adopt safe practices.  As a result, we are among the hardest hit nations in the world.

Why do we passively accept anti-social behavior from people who endanger our families and livelihoods?  Safety practices can become behavior standards for our communities and our nation when enough of us speak up directly to those who misbehave.  That won’t be a pleasant task but it is not nearly as difficult as allowing a virus to rule our lives.

Some retail clerks and managers say they fear abusive behavior and threats by anti-maskers; and that is why they don’t enforce their own rules.  Anti-maskers are getting their way through noisy intimidation and bullying.  They are impeding our war effort and allowing the virus to linger; and they will continue until responsible citizens stand up to them.  I’ve seen a few folks publicly confront those who are not doing their part.  It is uncomfortable, but I am learning to do it too.  We are at war with a virus.  Those who do not follow safety practices endanger us all.  Their traitorous behavior is unacceptable.

The death toll, economic damage, inability to operate schools normally, and other consequences of not masking, not distancing, and allowing unsafe mass gatherings is a burden that good citizens should not have to bear.  The nations in the chart above are home to freedom loving people that are succeeding against the virus.  They all have leaders who are educating the public and pushing voluntary compliance. Many also have penalties for non-compliance. Germany,

A picture of presidential leadership – the vast majority of Donald Trump’s audience was unmasked on the White House lawn to hear him accept the Republican presidential nomination.

France, Australia, South Korea, Japan, UK, and Canada have all used fines or other penalties at times when voluntary compliance didn’t work.

It’s difficult to fathom why police and prosecutors are resistant to enforcement, when laws or emergency orders are in place.  One common explanation is lack of resources, but that doesn’t stand up to close examination.  The virus is the most dangerous and immediate threat to our public safety.  Consider that police do have resources to monitor speed limit violations by radar.  Some of that time could be reallocated to routine checks of masking compliance at high risk locations.  Masking compliance could also become part of routine patrols.  If someone calls to report a mask or distancing violation, it can be triaged in the same way as other calls.  A violent crime in progress is a high priority.  Taking an in-person report of a stolen lawn mower is a lower priority.  Police make triage decisions every day and they generally do it well.

Many Americans are masking, distancing and avoiding crowds because they have believed CDC advice, because they care for others and because it’s the right thing to do.  But now the Trump administration is manipulating information from CDC and other sources to sow doubt about scientific facts.  They are misleading rather than leading their loyalists.

Americans have been watching a microscopic virus take away our schools, churches, businesses, friends and families.  The non-performance of our government at the national and local level leaves the work to individuals and private groups.  That’s why we need to have plain-talk conversations with anyone who doesn’t mask or distance; and refuse to passively accept the deaths and damage that they are causing.  Patriotic Americans do not sit idle while the nation is losing a war.  We’re running out of time and resources to fight the virus.  Think about it.  How will you help?

Click Here to see current world wide virus statistics

FUNDING SOCIAL SECURITY

It’s time for honest consideration of the problems facing Social Security but first, the good news.  The Social Security Trust Fund, from which benefits are paid, has a balance of $2.9 trillion.  The money that was deducted from our paychecks and the matching contributions from our employers built that bala Continue reading FUNDING SOCIAL SECURITY

You don’t know what you’ve got…

“You don’t know what you’ve got ’til it’s gone.” The old adage came to mind as I thought about my local newspaper – the one that’s been printing my columns for several years. It reports on local government, sports, arts, births, deaths, achievements, crimes, churches and the myriad of other things that make up our daily lives. People still clip and deliver pictures of friends because it’s something important when your child’s picture is in the paper. Continue reading You don’t know what you’ve got…

WILL YOU BE FIRED?

“Oh people, look around you.  The signs are everywhere.  You’ve left it for somebody other than you to be the one to care.”  Jackson Brown wrote those lyrics to “Rock me on the water” (click to hear Keb Mo sing it) about 50 years ago.  Today his words seem to haunt our future as much as they did our past.

There are more than 7.5 billion of us humans and our numbers continue to grow.  Who cares about the unintended consequences of our collective actions?  Our individual choices about economics, environment, health and other questions seem to be our personal business until we consider their collective effect. Continue reading WILL YOU BE FIRED?

Economic War Or Peace?

Asymmetric warfare is war between belligerents whose relative military power differs greatly, or who employ drastically different strategy or tactics. It is typically a war between a standing, professional army and an insurgency or resistance movement.  Guerrilla warfare and terrorism are two examples.  Our armed forces will not be defeated by the Taliban.  But, on the other hand, we have not been able to drive them from the field in Afghanistan.  I’m wondering if we are entering an era of asymmetric economic warfare.    Are we vulnerable to economic wars that we won’t lose but can’t decisively win? Continue reading Economic War Or Peace?

THE ECONOMY MUST SERVE PEOPLE

“The economy must serve people, not the other way around.”  That is the opening sentence of the US Conference of Catholic Bishops’ statement “The Dignity of Work and the Rights of Workers“.  Regardless of your religious beliefs, I encourage readers to look it up on the internet.  It’s easy to understand the values being taught but challenging to apply them in our lives, businesses and government. Continue reading THE ECONOMY MUST SERVE PEOPLE

Let’s start winning

Sister Jean-Delores Schmidt is a 98 year old nun who serves as a chaplain for  the Loyola University basketball team and travels with them.  Defying odds and expectations, the team earned a spot in the final four of the men’s basketball tournament.  During the celebration, a reporter asked Sister Jean, “What did you give up for lent?”  “Losing” she replied with a smile.  Think about that for a moment. Continue reading Let’s start winning

IS THE FINANCIAL END NEAR?

The cartoon made me laugh. Maybe it’s funny because it’s based in truth.   Although I hope that our national litany of mini-crises and scandals will end soon, I don’t expect it.  These stormy times are distracting us from more important issues, particularly our national financial situation. Continue reading IS THE FINANCIAL END NEAR?

THE COMING FISCAL CRISIS

The caller was a friend that I haven’t seen for too long.  She’s up in years, older even than me, but as quick-witted and engaging as I remembered.  “Why”, she wanted to know, “haven’t you written about Republicans’ plan to take away deductions for medical expenses?”  Then she told me her story.  I had promised myself a respite from the tax law controversy, but it’s too important to be left alone.

Karen and her husband Jim (not their real names) are neither poor nor wealthy.  They saved and managed their money well in preparation for retirement but Jim is now ill, disabled, and in need of daily assistance in just about all of his activities.  With Karen’s help, he doesn’t have to go to a nursing home, but she can’t meet all of his needs so she pays for daily help.  Medicare and insurance don’t cover the cost.  The budget is tight but they make it work.

Under current tax law Karen can deduct medical expenses that exceed 10 percent of their income.  So, if their taxable income is $50,000 and the medical expenses not covered by insurance are $20,000, here’s how it works.  They pay an amount equal to 10 percent of income, $5000 in this case.  That leaves another $15,000 of expenses that she can deduct from their income.  So they will pay income tax on $35,000 rather than $50,000.  If they are in the 15 percent tax bracket, the deduction would save them $2250.  That’s a lot of money when you’re on a tight budget.

The fate of their deductions will be decided behind closed doors in a House-Senate Conference Committee.   The Senate version of the Republican bill will allow the deduction.  If the House version passes, Karen and Jim will be spared the trouble of keeping records because the expenses won’t be deductible.

“What can we do?” Karen asked me.  I stuttered a lot trying to find an answer.  She wrote and called congressmen.  She never got to talk to one and her perception is that their minds are made up to pass a bill quickly without considering who will be hurt.  She’ll try again anyway because neither of us knows an alternative.

The fates of Karen, Jim and millions of other Americans are in the hands of congressional Republicans who seem intent on passing a law before public opposition rises to an insurmountable level.  There have been no public hearings with expert testimony, no people like Karen explaining their concerns and few, if any, town hall meetings where legislators face voter questions. Republicans seem desperate to pass something – anything – rather than face economists, experts and angry constituents.

It’s easy to get lost in lists of tax bill losers: the sick, graduate students, the middle class, residents of high tax states, on and on.  Hundreds of issues are up for grabs.  They’re all important but to focus on any one of them is to miss the fact that we have no financial plan for our national future.  Either version of the Republican bill will add somewhere between $1 trillion and $1.5 trillion to our budget deficits in ten years, and deficits will continue after that at a similar rate.  That borrowed money will be given to corporations and the wealthiest 1 percent of Americans in the form of tax cuts.  Every American will be obligated to repay the debt.

There’s no way to make a sensible budget from the revenue that will remain after the tax cuts.  Social Security is self-funded by employee and employer contributions.  It will remain totally self-sufficient through 2036.  It needs a bit more revenue or lower expenses to be solvent past that date but its problems seem minor.   The crisis is in the rest of the budget.

Republicans have pledged to increase spending or hold it steady for defense, Medicare, and Medicaid/Health programs.  Their tax bill does not produce enough non-social security revenue to pay for anything else after keeping those promises and paying interest on the national debt.   Yes, you read it right.  They have promised to spend all federal tax revenue on defense, Medicare, Medicaid/Health and interest expense.  Did they do the math before they made the promises?

The Republican plan cuts taxes so much that there is no sensible financial path forward, just a mountain of debt.  The light that they claim to see at the end of the tunnel is a train; and it’s headed our way.

TO DOWNLOAD CHART CLICK HERE

IF REPUBLICAN TAX PLAN HAD BEEN LAW IN 2016
REVENUE
BILLIONS SOURCE
2016 FEDERAL REVENUE $3300 CONGRESSIONAL BUDGET OFFICE
LESS SOCIAL SECURITY REVENUE ($958) SOCIAL SECURITY TRUSTEES REPORT
NON SOCIAL SECURITY REVENUE $2342
LESS TAX CUT ($100) MEDIAN OF ESTIMATES
FUTURE PROJECTED REVENUE $2242
SPENDING
MEDICARE $593  

DERIVED FROM PEW RESEARCH CENTER

CLICK LINK FOR SPECIFICS

MEDICAID/HEALTH $514
DEFENSE AND VA $790
INTEREST ON DEBT $237
SUBTOTAL $2134
PROPOSED DEFENSE INCREASE $116 ESTIMATE BASED ON SENATE PROPOSAL
SPENDING PROTECTED BY REPUBLICAN PROMISES $2250
ALL OTHER 2016 SPENDING $869
PROJECTED DEFICIT $877

TAX REFORM FOR WORKING AMERICANS

There are far better ideas for tax reform than the ones congress is considering.  I’m trying to spread the word about alternatives that really help working Americans.  If you agree please like, share, and send the ideas on to your representatives and senators.  There are sharing options at the bottom of the page.  You can download a PDF or photo version for sharing by clicking the links below.  The text follows.

TAX REFORM FOR WORKING AMERICANS pdf version

TAX REFORM FOR WORKING AMERICANS jpg photo version

TAX REFORM FOR WORKING AMERICANS

Here are tax reform ideas that will raise take-home pay, help low-income workers enter the middle class, and grow the US economy for all of us.  If you agree, please share it and “like” it on social media.  Also send it to your representatives and senators.

  1. Apply new tax revenue from ideas below to reducing the current rates of Medicare and Social Security payroll taxes. (That will result in increased take-home pay for everyone who is employed.)
  1. Create a national sales tax of about 1% on stocks, bonds and other financial instruments. (A carpenter who buys a new saw to earn income will pay a sales tax.  Doesn’t it seem fair that someone who buys stock to make money would also pay a tax?) 
  1. Create a national property tax of about 1% on accumulated wealth including real estate, personal property and financial assets in excess of $5 million for a household. Raise it to 2% above $20 million.   (The very wealthy could continue to grow their fortunes by making productive investments that earn more than the tax rate.)
  1. Apply all income and payroll tax rates used for wages to non-wage income including interest, dividends and appreciation of assets.  (Why is it right to tax income earned by labor at a higher rate than investment income?)
  1. Retain the estate tax which allows a family to pass on $11.8 million tax-free to heirs and applies a 40% tax rate on larger inheritances. (Why is it right that those working their way up the economic ladder have payroll taxes on every dollar they earn while the heirs of the wealthy start with billions of tax-free income?)

RATIONALE:  The US economy now features very high corporate profits and very high stock market values.  Many corporations have so much money that they are using it to buy back their own stock rather than investing in new productive capacity.  The economy needs increased demand for products and services to drive growth.  This tax plan puts more cash in the hands of those who work for wages and particularly benefits those with low and middle income jobs.  They will spend most of their increased take-home pay on products and services.  The increase in demand will create investment opportunities for the wealthy and for corporations.  Everybody wins.

CORPORATIONS:  There are rational arguments for reducing or even eliminating income taxes on corporations.  That can be done by attributing corporate profits or losses directly to shareholders annually and taxing them at their personal rate.  A separate rate could be established for offshore holders of stock in US corporations.

    CREATED BY:  Bob Morrison – bob@bobmorrison.org